🔗 Share this article

Members of the jury involved in a widely publicized Queensland murder trial have been taken to the isolated shore where the victim was discovered.

The 24-year-old victim was repeatedly stabbed with a bladed weapon and placed in a sandy resting place with minimal chance of survival, the jury has heard.

The remains were discovered by her father the following day on Wangetti Beach – a section of coastline nestled between the popular destinations of Cairns and Port Douglas.

The accused, 41, denies killing Ms Cordingley on a Sunday afternoon in October 2018 in northern Australia.

Court Inspection to Beach

The jury of 12 individuals plus three alternates attended the beach along with the judge and legal counsel on Monday morning local time.

In a nod to the hot climate and sweltering heat, the judge wore a T-shirt, athletic wear and sneakers rather than a wig and robes.

Both the lead prosecution and defence barristers chose polo shirts, shorts and headwear.

Scene Details

The jurors were led around 1.2km north up the sand to see where Ms Cordingley's body were discovered.

Earlier, as they traveled to the site, several markers indicated where the vehicle had been parked.

The trip was designed to help the panel become familiar with important sites in the case and no official evidence was given.

Context of the Case

Last week, the court was informed that the day after Ms Cordingley's remains were discovered, Mr Singh departed from Australia to India – leaving behind his spouse, three children and parents.

He was not heard from until he was arrested four years later, the state said.

State Case

It is alleged that the defendant, who was employed in healthcare in the town of Innisfail, near Cairns, had a altercation with Ms Cordingley.

The pharmacy worker was discovered wearing a swimwear, with her attire and belongings absent.

Those items were taken by the killer to avoid detection, the prosecution contend.

Her dog, Indie, which Ms Cordingley had brought along for a stroll, was located tied up to a tree concealed in shrubland about 30 metres from the burial site.

No murder weapon was ever recovered, and no eyewitnesses have been identified.

But the prosecution says the evidence – though circumstantial – was comprised proof that indicated Mr Singh "excluding other suspects."

This will include evidence that genetic material recovered from a stick at the location was 3.8 billion times more probable to have originated from Mr Singh than a unrelated individual of the population.

The jury has previously been told testimony suggesting that Ms Cordingley's phone left the scene after the incident – and that its travel matched those of a blue Alfa Romeo belonging to the defendant.

Mr Singh's sudden departure from Australia also pointed to his guilt, the prosecution has argued.

Defense Position

"As the police were discovering Toyah's body, he was organizing... a hurriedly arranged single journey back to India," the prosecutor said last week as he opened his case.

The defence is has not present any evidence, but in his initial statement, the defense attorney Greg McGuire portrayed his client as a "calm" and "compassionate" man, who was in the "wrong place at the wrong time."

He also foreshadowed evidence to come later in the trial that, after his arrest, Mr Singh told an plainclothes agent he had witnessed two masked men attack Ms Cordingley and then had run away in terror – something he said was his "biggest mistake."

The defense attorney has also said he will testify about other people "identified and unidentified" who should come under suspicion.

Additional Evidence

Ms Cordingley's partner, Marco Heidenreich, whom authorities excluded as a person of interest, was one who testified previously.

The trial was informed he was an initial person of interest – and that he had faced questions from Ms Cordingley's father about whether he was implicated in his partner's disappearance, prior to her body were discovered.

Images depicting the witness on a walk with a companion on the day Ms Cordingley disappeared have been presented to the court, with an specialist saying he was certain the pictures were authentic and had not been doctored in any manner.

The trial will return to the more conventional setting of the courtroom on the next day.