🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange made a significant forecast – going beyond who would win citywide, and block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and polling.

He released his highly detailed forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict the independent candidate’s strong performance – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for witty coinages. He highlighted, as an example, the split between the “commie corridor”, stretching from Park Slope to another area to Astoria, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on affluent parts of Manhattan. There, “the Free Press and Wall Street Journal surpass the mainstream paper” in readership and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Election Night Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your night?

I had to do that since they were dropping around 200,000 ballots into the tally every few minutes! I was actually somewhat anxious at the beginning: The candidate was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but there were two big batches of ballots that came in after that and the advantage dropped from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out somewhat badly for Mamdani, in which the opponent would have basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But Mamdani added half a million votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his support from the primary.

Coalition Building

Where did Mamdani gain additional support from?

He built the coalition that progressives always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the primary. Additionally he further maximized his base of left-leaning activists, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. He couldn’t have won without expanding his appeal.

He created the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse, young, tenants and residents squeezed by affordability

Additionally, there were some supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a genuine phenomenon, limited to Hispanic laborers, Asian communities and Muslims. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. But I wouldn’t say he was gaining Caucasian laborers and Maga voters.

Turnout and Impact

A major development of the night was the sky-high participation. Who did that help?

Both sides. Turnout was significantly higher than anticipated. I thought we might go over 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial opposition group, who were motivated, but his supporters was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over 50% of the vote. Is he likely for that?

Right now you would say he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has 50.4% but there’s still around 200K ballots uncounted at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think probable, and I hope he achieves it because afterwards no one can say Sliwa was a disruptor.

GOP Decline

The GOP candidate, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His support plummeted.

He lost a single precinct in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an highly conservative neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent held very white areas, affluent zones and devout communities, and then added many Republicans on Staten Island with a strong turnout. I think there was a lot of strategic balloting by the Republicans. They were doing it prior to the former president tweeted his support for the candidate, but that definitely helped. It could have even turned the tide if the winning alliance hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

Regarding your much mentioned left-wing base – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think there was a little dilution of the commie corridor in some areas like Astoria or Greenpoint that have more older white ethnic folks. In Astoria, for example, the property owners and residents supported the independent. So there was some opposition. However overall, mostly the leftist base is a key factor why Zohran won – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Community Support

In the lead-up to the vote we reported on whether the candidate was gaining ground with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he did?

There are areas with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – like specific locales – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts such as the Upper East Side, his Middle East stance definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the more middle-class Jewish areas like Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from Eastern Europe in southern Brooklyn, they were pretty staunchly supportive. So it’s unclear if there were major surprises here, but Mamdani retained left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city represents in politics? Will the commie corridor become a launch pad for leftwing candidates?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will come from these areas to be promoted to higher office.

However I believe that each urban center in America could develop similar progressive hubs. Urban places are the centers of leftwing power in America – because they’re young, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities exist.